First benchmarks: Catalyst vs. Django

This comparison is little silly because I don't have time to deploy mod_python / fastcgi / lighttpd or anything like such-good-approach. I just wrote the same code (make SQL join, show template with same fields, same logic) and check it with ab (apache benchmark tool) against framework own servers.

Catalyst

Server Software:
Server Hostname:        localhost
Server Port:            3000

Document Path:          /gallery/
Document Length:        7185 bytes

Concurrency Level:      1
Time taken for tests:   64.568406 seconds
Complete requests:      5000
Failed requests:        0
Write errors:           0
Total transferred:      36675000 bytes
HTML transferred:       35925000 bytes
Requests per second:    77.44 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       12.914 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       12.914 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          554.68 [Kbytes/sec] received

Django

Server Software:        WSGIServer/0.1
Server Hostname:        localhost
Server Port:            8000

Document Path:          /
Document Length:        4981 bytes

Concurrency Level:      1
Time taken for tests:   61.358104 seconds
Complete requests:      5000
Failed requests:        0
Write errors:           0
Total transferred:      25625000 bytes
HTML transferred:       24905000 bytes
Requests per second:    81.49 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       12.272 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       12.272 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          407.84 [Kbytes/sec] received

With some modifications (eg: running together) the timings are like 100:96 for Django. A little faster. Will it differ much if we deploy it with Apache-and-the-fastest-way?